in media res


the body in the pure moment of pricking
February 20, 2008, 8:20 pm
Filed under: anne, culture, semiology
“The body” has been termed and used in many different contexts throughout media and cultural studies. It is the gendered, the racial body; it is the vulnerable, the emotional body, the surface, the container, the discursive.Lately, it has been discussed that the body cannot be seen as either male or female. There is no pure masculinity to which male applies, neither is there pure femininity connected with femaleness. Discourse has been easing its way through and around the body, making it to be something almost virtual. As if it wasn’t there, as if discourse was everything that needs to be considered when talking about identity, whether that be sexual, gendered, or even class identity.There has been so much discourse on the floating body, being and becoming as it may because of culture, social circumstances and whatever else that sometimes I would like to pinch myself to see whether my body is still there. And I ask myself: who am I? I am skin, bones, muscles, joints, blood, veins, organs, electricity, nerves – saying that I try to grasp some of the physical embodiment of my body. Nevertheless, naming these I’m supposedly already leaving the innocence of my endeavour. There is no pure, no authentic sense of the body. It is named and therefore no longer just is.

skin

So I struggle onwards; something that has always fascinated and, at the same time, abhorred me is the sight of a needle breaking through the skin, something alien actually entering the body without any resistance from itself. It is so easy to penetrate the skin, like cutting butter with a hot knife. There it is, the pure moment of physical embodiment. Everything is concentrated on that very moment when the sharp front bit of the needle disappears under the skin, and bit by bit the metallic slides into the body, milimeter by milimeter. I don’t think about gender any more, or about race, class, sex. I am aware of the utmost vulnerability of me.

.meandomedar+DANTE


3 Comments so far
Leave a comment

this is a violent image that you attached! I think that the notion of penetration is gendered? Penetration is always a masculine act done to ‘feminine’ bodies, either female or male. I wonder why you chose the word ‘penetration’ on the title but ‘embodyment’ in the text…
It is interesting to look at bjork’s ‘all is full of love’
videoclip for a postmodern approach to dualisms mechanical/organic, female/male, real/virtual
and also embodyment/penetration and interestingly the notion of ‘pure’.
at

Comment by aristea F

i like the video, although it also scares me. what i think is suggested here is that the human and the robot-like merge, it’s similar to the story about any kind of sci-fi that tries to accentuate the human in any kind of artificial intelligence. i believe there still is a difference between the two and i would strongly argue for this separation to be upheld. mankind is made of much more than just mechanical movements.
i like the video, though, because of its ambiguity – it seems to portray same sex love but at the same time there is no sex as such, nothing organic. nevertheless, the two protagonists can be decoded as female, no?

about the picture and title i chose: maybe i’m using a word here that doesn’t quite work the same way in english as it does in german. penetration can be understood as a sexual act of a male done to a (fe)male. but it also means breaking through a bodily border, which was the meaning i wanted to attach to it…i used the word again when describing the entrance of the needle into the body. and the image i use had to be shocking for me, i think, because it stops me thinking and engages me in a more emotional, very immediate state. that’s what i wanted to bring across – this pressing feeling of vulnerability.

Comment by meandomedar

after all, i changed the title…it might have indeed sounded rather unsettling..

Comment by meandomedar




Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>